home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: in1.uu.net!shore!news
- From: ay@warpsoft.com (Albert Yarusso)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 21:04:49 GMT
- Organization: Shore.Net/Eco Software, Inc; (info@shore.net)
- Message-ID: <4ebfl1$ldp@shore.shore.net>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4eao5p$mbg@news.internetmci.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-0-28.shore.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- rknapp@mcimail.com (Rich Knapp) wrote:
-
- >In <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net>, charles stoyer <cstoyer@interpex.com> writes:
- >>BASIC stands for "Beginners All-purpose ? Interpretive Code"
- >>and that scares the living hell out of me. I have been a
-
- >And the answer is....
- > Beginners All-purpose Symbolic Interpretive Code.
-
- Hmm, I always thought it was Beginners All-purpose Symbolic
- Instruction Code... Of course, some version of BASIC are _still_
- interpretive (such as VB)..
-
- ..Al
-
- >FWIW
-
- >rk
-
-
-